It’s great to finish first, but it’s really really great to not finish last

Manchester United celebrate another Premier League title

Today was the final day of the English Premier League season. As was expected there was a lot of excitement at the top of the table. Chelsea needed a victory to possibly finish in first, but could only manage to draw after giving up a late goal to Bolton two minutes into injury time. That meant that with its 2-0 victory over Wigan, Manchester United claimed its 17th Premier League title.

But that’s not what this post is about. See, the great thing about European soccer is that as exciting and consequential as the fight at the top standings is, the competition at the bottom of the league is every bit as exciting with the results meaning just as much if not more. And unlike in American professional leagues, the drama at the lower end of the league has nothing to do with teams tanking games to get higher draft picks. No no no. In Europe, if your record is bad, you have every incentive to win. If you don’t you won’t be around to play next year.

Relegation. I think it’s a wonderful concept. The worst three teams in the every division at the end of the season are demoted to the lower division, and the first three teams are promoted to the higher division. This year Reading, Danny Murphy celebrates the goal that saved Fulham from relegationBirmingham, and Derby were the bottom three in the Premier League so next year they will be playing in the Championship instead. Fulham needed a 1-0 victory on the last day of play to avoid relegation and they did so only because of goal difference.

Relegation is no small matter for a club. Aside from the tens of millions of pounds a club will lose in Premier League television contract money and other revenue streams, they will also have a much harder time holding on to its key players and attracting good new players. Relegation is not good for anyone and a club works hard to avoid it.

As a matter of practicality and logistics it is impossible, or at least very very very unlikely, but relegation is a concept that could do wonders for a number of American professional leagues. For a couple reasons, competition at the lower end of American Leagues is de-incentivized. For one, usually the worse your record the better chance you have getting a high draft pick for the next year. So if you are not going to make the playoffs, you might as well finish last. Secondly, because of revenue sharing and other deals, owners of even really bad teams make a lot of money. Don’t get me wrong, I am in favor of revenue sharing, but nonetheless it must be acknowledged that it, to some degree, disassociates the profitability of the team from its success on the field of play; not completely, but to some degree.

If there was some AAA team ready to replace them, I think the Tampa Rays (or whatever the team is now called) might have a less cavalier outlook on finishing at the bottom of the AL east every year. The Texas Rangers and Pittsburgh Pirates might be a little uncomfortable also. Would the Miami Heat really have won only fifteen games this year if there was a chance the Dwayne Wade would have to suit up for a D-League team next year? I doubt it. Pat Riley certainly would not have been taking games off to go scout Derrick Rose and Michael Beasley. Can you imagine if there was a lower division of the NFL? Maybe somehow Roger Goodell works out a deal to acquire the CFL. I would not want to be the one to inform Bill Parcells that he must switch places with the Saskatchewan Roughriders and that he cannot return the dolphins to NFL unless he wins a Grey Cup.

Ah well, if only…

4 Responses to “It’s great to finish first, but it’s really really great to not finish last”

  1. Kwame, as much as I love the idea of relegation (and I don’t) in American professional sports, the whole idea of running American sports like European football, in any regard, is absurd.

    It’s basically baseball, but without the draft. Every player is signed by free agency; you cannot win without money. If you think you’re tired of seeing Yanks / Sox now, try it when teams like the Rays and Marlins have a zero percent chance of landing even a decent player.

    What makes American sports great is that, the more American a sport is run, the more parity there is in the sport. American football is the prime example: Every year a team from the cellar of their division will reach the top, and every year a team that made the Super Bowl will not return to the playoffs.

    In European football, it’s the same teams again and again and again (worse than baseball, even!). Man U, Chelsea, Arsenal and Liverpool will play in the Champions League from the English Premier League. Barcelona and Real Madrid will make the Champions League from La Liga. Juventus and AC Milan from Seria A, etc. You can bank on it. I will bet you my life savings that in 10 years, those eight teams will represent their leagues in the Champions League. Name another sport where you can make that guarantee.

    So here’s the deal: Run it like European football, and if you do, you’ll get excitement in the very top flight teams, and in the very bottom flight teams of each division. Beyond that, it’s worse than any American sport, because there is no hope of either winning or losing. You have excitement for Yanks / Sox and Royals / Rays. If you’re a Phillies fan, count on a .500 season every year. Same for Reds, same for Cards, same for Dodgers, same for…

    The idea is stupid.

  2. Yes, I agree to run American professional sports leagues like European soccer would be a bad idea. But that’s not what I said. All I am suggesting is that if you could somehow manage to integrate that one aspect of it, It would be an improvement the system. In the same way that if you could introduce a draft and revenue sharing to Europe it would be an improvement. I know logistics and tradition make either extremely unlike if not impossible, but the point it is, so long I as i can dream, I want the best of both worlds.

    Whether or not the model or the American sports league is the best or not, it is not without it’s flaws. European leagues are certainly not without their flaws, some of which you list, but there are some aspects of their management that are better than here. I an ideal world (admitted unrealistic) we could take the best parts of both and leave out all the bad parts.

  3. Yeah, my apologies for coming off so harsh before. I suppose I could see the merit in a relegation bracket, holding teams accountable to winning, even at the end of the season. I just know that it’d never work, firstly, because we do hold a draft, and how do you decide which teams get to draft? Would the top tier draft every year, and everyone else field teams based on free agency? Secondly, obviously revenue sharing is a huge obstacle, but revenue sharing is the best thing ever to happen to (some) American sports. I suppose we’ll just have to learn to appreciate both separately for what they are.

  4. It could work like this. The teams participating in the draft would just be the teams that would be competing in the league the next year. So if you get relegated, you are not in the draft. More incentive to to win. The top three picks go to the promoted teams. The next picks are selected in lottery fashion.

    I don’t know how you get around revenue sharing though. They are ridiculously top heavy over there. The big clubs can just buy whoever they want. And I don’t see them really embracing a new system, even gradually.

Leave a Reply