Nowhere near the end

It has been barely twenty-four hours since Barack Obama secured the Democratic Party nomination for president. There has been no shortage of people declaring this a historic moment in the course of our nation. You will get no argument from me on that notion. Only a handful of events in the social development on this young country are even comparable. That’s the glass-half-full way I see things. The more pessimistic parts of me feel the need to point out two things.

One, Barack ain’t won nothing yet! The party nomination is critical and it has been the focus for the past year and more, but it was never the end goal. As contentious as the primary race was, it is guaranteed to seem tame compared to the upcoming five months. Much like a sports team that makes the playoffs, acknowledgment is appropriate and celebration is deserved, but proper perspective is paramount. The Democratic Party, by virtue of its nominating process, has probably squandered most of whatever advantage it may held over the GOP at the start of the campaign and now must engage in a close race with Senator John McCain and the GOP political machinery. Still, it seems too many people are already looking past the general election and all the way to inauguration night. For Obama supporters, now is not the pat ourselves on the back, but rather it is the time to redouble and refocus our efforts.

Two, an Obama win does not signify the end of racism! Oh, I wish it did, but it doesn’t. Since the day Senator Obama entered the race, plenty of people have waxed poetic about dreams of a post-racial America. To be sure, the Obama nomination and possible election are reflective of tremendous racial progress in our country, and could possibly spur unprecedented racial progress in their wake. The problem is that even though we have come a long way, we still have a long way to go. The social, educational, political, and economic discrepancies that both preserve and expand the racial divide are so deeply-rooted in all aspects American life, that it would nothing short of naive to expect that any single event could provide immediate remedy for all these ails. In the same way that Obama is not president yet, racism is not gone yet: two points that might be had to perceive in the current media climate.

All that said, the most important thing to keep in mind is that eight years of George W. Bush were eight years too many, so the four more years that John McCain wants to instill are unacceptable. People, let’s get Barack Obama into the White House.

9 Responses

  1. So Obama is going to change politics and be able to “unite” people, but yet all his supporters decide to do the same tired political hacking of linking all people with an “R” next to their name as one in the same. Obama is no different then all other politicians, he is not going to change anything. McCain and Bush represent to completely different spectrums of the republican party, and if Obama is trying to associate the two and say that McCain is running for a 3rd Bush term then he is doing the same thing that all democrats and/or republicans do, try to split us. Way to be a uniter Senator Obama.

  2. The other example of partisan politics and how obama is the same old is after he “clinched” the nomination his speech was essentially “i appreciate what mccain has done for this nation BUT” and then listed 15 things and started the national campaign attacking right away…..where as mccain’s speech that night was completely congratulatory both towards obama and clinton. If anyone is running a “change” campaign for how politics should be done it is McCain. He is the one that wants them to fly around together so voters can actually learn the truth of the differences between them and let the voters decide who is better to lead…no word yet from obama if he has agreed to this but probably not because he is low on substance and high on rhetoric (that is why he stopped doing debates with clinton) when actually asked about the how of his change and what he is going to do, he losses his credibility….stick to rhetoric obama “change” “bush” “3rd term” that is all you got.

  3. John, can you do me a favor and list for me the five most important issues on which Bush and McCain have policy differences?

  4. John, you should stop relying upon the Wall Street Journal and the Confederate Times for your news on Obama. If one were to actually watch the democratic debates, you would have noticed that after 20 debates, the debate on policy was getting redundant. When Cleveland rolled around I could have predicted what each candidate was going to say before they said it because they had been asked the same questions 10 times before in previous debates. The reason why ABC news got so much flack for their debate was that they had nothing else policy wise to ask the candidates so they just turned to the old gossip he said she said questions. By then the debates were becoming counterproductive. And that’s one of the reasons Obama stopped them. For someone that hates Hillary, John, you really buy into her arguments.

  5. I am not pro-mccain, but anti-obama. As for Fang’s comment, I agree the Hillary and Obama hug fest was getting tiring. Nothing was coming out of either of them (except for the occasional gaffe from obama). But I am referring to the McCain and Obama town hall meetings. These would be new and very good to have seeing that there are stark differences between McCain and Obama (for example McCain wants to win the war on terror while Obama wants to put his tail between his legs and ask for forgiveness from everyone as he retreats). And I cannot stand Hillary, but I am a 3rd party observer and can easily see the bias and crap that was directed against Hillary. Too bad you are too much in love with your savior Obama to see any of his faults (which he has many)

  6. As for Kwame, do you really think there is not much of a difference between McCain and Bush? Check out the linked graph. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:McCain-ACU-ADA-scores.gif
    One can see that when Bush was in office for the first term how McCain began to lean more “liberal” or what I like to refer to as the dark side. So during this time McCain appears more liberal or stupid because he is disagreeing with Bush, but one can also see that historically McCain has been conservative constantly.

    Without any research I will name two historical examples of where McCain was different then Bush….
    1. McCain was pushing for the surge for a long time before Bush and others got behind him. The surge has been a complete success.
    2. McCain was against the tax cuts in Bush’s first term because it did not cut spending. (something I agree with McCain on, they should have cut spending BIG TIME and should still do so)

    Now can you answer how Obama is different than Marx?

  7. The accuracy or inaccuracy of your historical examples not withstanding, they do not actually address the point, but rather expose a different, and perhaps more damaging criticism: for as much as Maverick John McCain was reviously willing to go against his party and his president, recently and at present he has altered his stances on a number of important issues and is in line with GW. It doesn’t matter if he disagreed with Bush 4 or 8 years ago, if he currently wishes to continues Bush’s policies.

  8. John,

    “…where as mccain’s speech that night was completely congratulatory both towards obama and clinton”

    Were you talking about McCain’s June 3rd speech? (http://elections.foxnews.com/2008/06/03/transcript-john-mccain-speech-on-the-general-election-race/)

    Because if so, that state is false; I think any 3rd party observer would agree that McCain’s speech was less than congratulatory to Mr. Obama

  9. Does anyone notice a paradox in John’s arguments? I mean he thinks Bush was the greatest president ever and now in support of McCain, he seeks to differentiate McCain from Bush. Just thought I’d share my observation.

Leave a Reply